Comments on: Water 4 Gas Comments

By: altgensis

altgensis — Sun, 06 Jun 2010 19:07:39 +0000

I noticed everyone using the Map sensor & O2 sensor to “lean” out the fuel to air mixture. Apparently the O2 sensor picks up more O2 coming out of the exaust.

This is because there is more O2 going into the intake. What if you reduced the amount of “air” coming into the air intake so that there was less “air” & more pure HO going into the intake manifold? If you put a flap over the air intake (operated by a solenoid & controlled by the on-off switch in the dash) you would then have more pure HO coming in & less Nitrogen from the atmosphere. This would produce less wasted O2 coming out the exaust in the form of Nitrous-oxide polution (much cleaner exaust). The MAP electronics would not be needed as the car computer would sense less O2 in the exaust & automatically lean out the gas. In other words, work with the HO system instead of against it.

You should also see a dramtic increase in fuel economy since more HO gas is being consumed in the actual process of pushing the piston instead of wasted in combining with nitrogen & polluting the atmosphere.

By: jim nelson

jim nelson — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 19:12:31 +0000

hi,
i have had an interest in this but i have a problem with the hexavalent chromium stew left when stainless steel is used, and how to get rid of it. any thoughts? or could some other metal be used that won’t corrode too bad.

By: bruce044

bruce044 — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 09:54:49 +0000

The first law of thermodynamics:- Energy can be neither created nor destroyed it can only be converted from one form to another.
In any process the total energy of the universe remains the same.

And your point is?

By: Joe Cummings

Joe Cummings — Wed, 08 Apr 2009 19:27:59 +0000

Did you ever hear of “The First Law of Thermodynamics”?

Or how about “The Law of Conservation of Energy”?

By: a2v

a2v — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 12:10:55 +0000

If its really working then it will save the world on the dependency of oil products that runs our vehicle.

By: brian jeffs

brian jeffs — Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:17:14 +0000

i made 1 jar and bought the other put them in cannected them up but could not get much vaqume and water leaking from both bubblers.what is wrong with the setup?this is on a ford ranger pickup diesl any info would be great.by email if poss

By: miles

miles — Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:32:05 +0000

Has anyone used this with straight ethanol or E-85? I got a very high compression 400 sbc with a E-85 modified 2bl holly 4412 with straight MSD vacuum advance distributer.

By: james

james — Sun, 04 Jan 2009 22:00:26 +0000

Well I will be another that says it works. I installed a hyd generator on my car, 1987 Toyota Supra, it runs better and my gas mileage has improved. On a trip that usually used half a tank of gas I used a quarter. So many skeptics or the round to its, It works and I am not selling anything. The design that works the best for me is made out of pvc 4” pipe. I used threaded rods and steel washers. I spaced the washers with nuts. I tried the wire and the plates, but the steel rods and washers works the best. Thanks it is websites like this that gave me the courage to build it and the knowledge to perfect it. Thanks again

By: Hava

Hava — Sun, 04 Jan 2009 05:54:06 +0000

The neatest idea I’ve heard lately is vehicles powered by air. I watched a video on it done by the BBC (it’s been a couple of months so I don’t have the URL handy, but I found it on YouTube, and it was quite in-depth – the video was a good 15 minutes long or so, focusing on this new development). It was a pretty cool idea – just like an air gun gets its force from pressurized air, the vehicle is run off pressurized air. It uses a small amount of gas in order to pressurize the air, but other than that, it is all air running the vehicle. Apparently it only took one fill up to go from New York to California in this vehicle.

That’s definitely something to check out. They were supposed to be mass produced in the US starting this year (2009) but of course that prediction was made last year, when the economy didn’t suck so bad and gas prices were much, much higher, so things might have changed dramatically since then. It’s certainly a cool concept though!

Havs
http://nonfictionlover.today.com

By: Not Buying This

Not Buying This — Fri, 02 Jan 2009 22:36:59 +0000

I will not be buying this science project but it is nice to see that people are continuing to work on the solutions to the problems of generating hydrogen gas. I like the pulse width voltage signal Idea especially. This is slick and solves many problems. Maybe I will be more interested in a 3rd generation system.

As to why GM is not interested in hydrogen I think the answer is they are broke and can’t afford to gamble on something that is not a sure thing?